We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

Update on prosecution of 2 juveniles in Kansas school bus incident

courtesy photo
courtesy photo

ELLSWORTH COUNTY – On Friday, Joe Shepack, Ellsworth County Attorney provided an update on the conviction and sentencing of two Great Bend juveniles involved in the incident on a school swim team bus trip.

In a media release, Shepack stated: On May 31, 2016, Connor Furrey, age 17, of Great Bend was convicted of a Class “B” misdemeanor battery in Ellsworth County District Court Case 2016-JV-04. Sentencing has been set for 2:00 P.M. on July 5, 2016. Mr. Furrey will remain free on bond until sentencing.

On June 1, 2016, Mr. Furrey’s co-defendant, Alan Matthew Bobbitt, was sentenced pursuant to his conviction for a Class “B” misdemeanor battery. Sentencing was conducted by the Honorable District Magistrate Judge Verle Willey.

The sentence was sentence to probation through May of 2017.

The sentencing judge noted that this was Mr. Bobbitt’s first conviction for a misdemeanor and that Mr. Bobbitt had previously issued an apology, through social media, to the victim, and that neither the victim nor a spokesperson for the victim appeared at sentencing, notwithstanding having been given notice of the sentencing date and time back in April of 2016. The sentencing judge also took note of a pending civil lawsuit directed at Mr. Bobbitt’s parents, which necessarily precluded Mr. Bobbitt from speaking on his own behalf at his sentencing.

On May 11, in Ellsworth County District Court Case (2016-CV-17) a lawsuit seeking monetary damages was filed on behalf of the defendant against twenty-one (21) named defendants including the Superintendent of USD 428; the Principal of Great Bend High School; two (2) Great Bend swim team coaches, a bus driver, and members of the USD #428 School Board. Also included as defendants are the parents of certain Great Bend High School students, including the parents of Mr. Bobbitt and Mr. Furrey.

The Ellsworth County Attorney makes no comment about the merits, or lack thereof, of said lawsuit, other than to remind the public that the standards of proof for civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings are vastly different.

To compare, a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit can prevail by presenting evidence that is 51% believable. This is called proving a case by a preponderance of the evidence. In criminal cases, the standard for conviction is “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”. Although there are no Kansas cases quantifying “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”, logic would suggest that we are talking about a 98% or 99% or 100% proof of guilt. Thus, persons who may not be convicted, nor even charged in criminal cases, may still face civil liability. Indeed, comparing civil cases to criminal cases is like comparing apples to oranges.

 

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File